Thursday, October 9, 2014

SCIENCE CONTEMPORARIES

THE HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE CONTEMPORARIES 0. Summary 1. Introduction 2. The system of rights in Habermas. Human rights and the tradition Occidental person: a description-structural perspective 3. The philosophical scope of the subject: to think the Rights of Man 4. Internal reconstruction of the Right: the system of rights 5.

The subjective right of social mediation between facticidad y Validad, in the structure of positive law 6. The Rights of the Man; Bibliography. 1. Introduction century XX will be in history, certainly, for good reasons, but, also, for what of more negative the humanity some time lived. Of course, it seems opportune to remember the wonders of the science, that, obviously, with the power of the technique and the technology, if interfered of decisive form, in the dichotomy well/badly, advantages/disadvantages, that the society marked human being, since the beginning of the century, with inesquecveis events, being, however, the history of the same ones under the responsibility of the successors.

Logically, the philosophers, in diverse specialties, have come to reflectir some of the acutilantes aspects most significant and of our time, where the dignity human being must not have multipurpose readings, because it will not have dignity human being while they will not be promoted and safeguarded the human rights. The task will not be easy, in the measure where such rights accumulate of stocks an amplest fan, that can be initiated in the individual equity (right politicians, social and economic) and to become enlarged it collective real interest (right to the peace, to the good environment, to solidarity) even so Weighs the constatao of the existence of an absurd list of crimes against the humanity, the truth are that it seems that the public opinion comes giving signals of a renewed sensitization for the problems of the Rights of the Man and that comes demystifying a false ideological debate, because, in the MACHETE optics, (1978: 45): ' ' It does not have ideology or social system that withholds the monopoly of the guarantee of these rights, because it is effectively about Rights of Man who each one will have to defend and on which all we will have to be in agreement.

No comments:

Post a Comment